System and method of monitoring and control of ultrafiltration volume during peritoneal dialysis using segmental bioimpedance

ABSTRACT

A peritoneal dialysis (PD) system for infusing a volume of PD solution into a patient&#39;s peritoneal cavity in order to perform peritoneal dialysis on the patient includes a peritoneal cavity monitor (PCM) that measures this volume of fluid in the patient&#39;s peritoneal cavity by segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (SBIS), to thereby determine an ultrafiltration volume of fluid in the patient&#39;s peritoneal cavity, and a switch, controlled by the PCM, for filling the patient&#39;s peritoneal cavity and draining the patient&#39;s peritoneal cavity when the ultrafiltration volume is unchanged over time, significantly decreased, or decreasing at a significant rate.

RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61,657,271, filed on Jun. 8, 2012. The entire teachings of the above application are incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Renal dysfunction or failure and, in particular, end-stage renal disease, causes the body to lose the ability to remove water and minerals and excrete harmful metabolites, maintain acid-base balance, and control electrolyte and mineral concentrations within physiological ranges. Toxic uremic waste metabolites including urea, creatinine, uric acid, and phosphorus accumulate in the body's tissues, which can result in a person's death if the filtration function of the kidney is not replaced.

Dialysis is commonly used to replace kidney function by removing these waste toxins and excess water. In one type of dialysis treatment, peritoneal dialysis (PD), sterile, pyrogen-free dialysis solution is infused into the patient's peritoneal cavity. The peritoneal membrane serves as a natural dialyzer and toxic uremic waste metabolites and various ions diffuse from the patient's bloodstream across the membrane into the dialysis solution due to their concentration gradients. At the same time, fluid is drawn into the peritoneal cavity by an osmotic gradient. The dialysis solution is removed, discarded and replaced with fresh dialysis solution on a semi-continuous or continuous basis.

In the routine care of patients on peritoneal dialysis, removal of fluid by ultrafiltration plays a significant role in maintenance of noinial body fluid volume and blood pressure. See Arkouche W., Fouque D., Pachiaudi C., Normand S., Laville M., Delawari E., Riou J. P., Traeger J., and Laville M., Total body water and body composition in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients, J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 1906-1914, 1997; Lindholm B., Werynski A., and Bergstrom J., Fluid transport in peritoneal dialysis, Int J Artif Organs 13:352-358, 1990; and Korbet M. S., Evaluation of ultrafiltration failure, Advances in Renal Replacement Therapy 5(3):194-204, 1998. The ability of the peritoneal membrane to remove fluid volume is typically assessed by the standard peritoneal equilibration test (PET), which measures the dialysate to plasma (D/P) ratio of selected substance (solute) concentrations, such as creatinine. For each solute, the transport rate is categorized as low, low average, high average, and high, in increasing ranges of the D/P ratio. See Twardowski Z. J., Nolph K. O., Khanna R., Prowant B. F., Ryan L. P., Moore H. L., and Nielsen M. P., Peritoneal Equilibration Test, Perit Dial Bull 7: 138-147, 1987; and Smit W., Estimates of peritoneal membrane function-new insights, Nephrol Dial Transplant 21: ii16-ii19, 2006 (hereinafter “Smit”). A high D/P ratio of creatinine is a reflection of ultrafiltration failure, as it is related to high absorption rates of low molecular weight osmotic agents, such as glucose, from the dialysate into the patient's blood, and therefore to a rapid disappearance of the osmotic gradient that enables removal of fluid from the patient into the dialysate. See Smit. After the disappearance of the osmotic gradient, fluid from the dialysate can be reabsorbed across the peritoneal membrane back into the patient. In such hyper-absorbing patients, the drain volume can be less than the initial filling volume, and is certainly less than the maximal desirable ultrafiltration volume. However, PET cannot be used to monitor the ability of the peritoneal membrane to remove fluid volume while a PD treatment is being administered. Traditionally, the total ultrafiltration volume (UFVM) is determined from the difference in weight between total filling and draining volumes at the end of a PD treatment, and therefore hyper-absorbing patients cannot be identified earlier in the treatment cycle.

Therefore, there is a need for improved monitoring of fluid removal by ultrafiltration for patients on peritoneal dialysis.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to peritoneal dialysis of a patient. In one embodiment, a peritoneal dialysis (PD) system for infusing a volume of PD solution into a patient's peritoneal cavity in order to perform peritoneal dialysis on the patient includes a peritoneal cavity monitor (PCM) that measures the volume of fluid in the patient's peritoneal cavity by segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (SBIS), to thereby determine an ultrafiltration volume of fluid in the patient's peritoneal cavity, and a switch, controlled by the PCM, for filling the patient's peritoneal cavity and draining the patient's peritoneal cavity when the ultrafiltration volume is unchanged over time, significantly decreased, or decreasing at a significant rate. Alternatively, instead of the switch, the peritoneal dialysis (PD) system can include an alarm, controlled by the PCM, for indicating when the patient's peritoneal cavity is to be drained when the ultrafiltration volume is unchanged over time, significantly decreased, or decreasing at a significant rate.

In another embodiment, a method of peritoneal dialysis of a patient includes introducing a volume of peritoneal dialysis solution into the peritoneal cavity of the patient, and measuring periodically the volume of fluid in the patient's peritoneal cavity by segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (SBIS), to thereby determine an ultrafiltration volume of fluid in the patient's peritoneal cavity. The method then includes draining the patient's peritoneal cavity when the ultrafiltration volume is unchanged over time, significantly decreased, or decreasing at a significant rate. The method can include refilling the peritoneal cavity of the patient with another volume of peritoneal dialysis solution.

The invention has many advantages, including the ability to drain the peritoneal cavity of a patient after a measured volume of fluid has accumulated therein, to minimize fluid reabsorption back into the patient, which is undesirable, thereby enabling interrupting the dialysis treatment cycle after a desired volume of fluid has been removed from the patient, or recognizing a significant reduction in ultrafiltration volume before this volume is further reduced by reabsorption back into the patient, and draining the peritoneal cavity and refilling it with another volume of dialysis fluid and continuing the dialysis treatment.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing will be apparent from the following more particular description of preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an exemplary placement of electrodes for measurement of fluid volume in the peritoneal cavity.

FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of another exemplary placement of electrodes and measurement of fluid volume in the peritoneal cavity.

FIG. 3 is a side view of the electrodes shown in FIG. 2 and the peritoneal cavity of a patient in a sitting position.

FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration of PD treatment and dialysate control. A switch (SW) is used to control drain or fill of fluid from or into the peritoneal cavity according to a signal from the peritoneal cavity monitor (PCM).

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an example of a device for measurement and control of the peritoneal dialysis treatment.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart for determining fluid exchange during PD treatment using SBIS.

FIG. 7 is a graph of the change in fluid volume (%) in the peritoneal cavity of patient #5 as a function of time (min).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to peritoneal dialysis of a patient. A method of peritoneal dialysis of a patient includes introducing a volume of peritoneal dialysis fluid into the peritoneal cavity of the patient. Any suitable peritoneal dialysis solution (i.e., peritoneal dialysis fluid) known in the art (e.g., Delflex®, Fresenius Medical Care North America, Waltham Mass.) can be used. The volume of PD fluid can be in a range of between about 1.5 L and about 2.5 L, preferably about 2 L. This known volume is used to calibrate the bioimpedance measurement of volume. The method includes measuring periodically the volume of fluid in the patient's peritoneal cavity during the PD treatment time, for example at time intervals of about 1 minute, about 5 minutes, about 30 minutes, etc. More frequent measurements provide a higher temporal resolution, enabling the detection of rapid changes in ultrafiltration volume. The fluid volume measurements are made by segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (SBIS). See Zhu F., Hoenich N. A., Kaysen G., Ronco C., Schneditz D., Murphy L., Santacroce S., Pangilinan A., Gotch F., and Levin N. W., Measurement of Intraperitoneal Volume by Segmental Bioimpedance Analysis During Peritoneal Dialysis, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 42: 167-172, 2003 (hereinafter “Zhu et al.”); and U.S. Pat. No. 7,354,417 to Levin et al. 2008. In this SBIS method, eight electrodes 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170, and 180 (e.g., standard ECG electrodes) are placed on the body, as shown in FIG. 1. Four electrodes 110, 120, 130, and 140 are electrodes for injecting current. Electrodes 150 and 170, and 160 and 180 are two pairs of electrodes for measurement of the voltage between distance L. The distance between injecting and measurement electrodes is D. A cable holder 185 can be used to fix the electrodes cable 186 with a band 187. The volume V of fluid in the peritoneal cavity is determined based on the relationship

$\begin{matrix} {V = {\frac{K_{p}}{\sigma}\left( \frac{L^{2}}{R} \right)}} & (1) \end{matrix}$

where K_(p) is a subject-specific calibration constant, σ is the conductivity of the fluid in the peritoneal cavity, and R is the average of R_(L) and R_(R), where R_(L)=Φ_(L)/I and R_(R)=Φ_(R)/I, where Φ_(L) is the voltage measured between electrodes 160 and 180, and Φ_(R) is the voltage measured between electrodes 150 and 170 upon injection of current I between electrodes 120 and 140 (left), and electrodes 110 and 130 (right), respectively. K_(p) can be determined by obtaining R_(LB) and R_(RB) before any fluid is introduced into the peritoneal cavity, and then obtaining R_(LA) and R_(RA) after a predetermined volume V_(C) of fluid (e.g., 2L) is introduced into the peritoneal cavity of the patient, wherein V_(C) is the change in fluid volume (ΔV) between time A and time B, and then determining K_(p) from the equation

$\begin{matrix} {{K_{p} = {\sigma \frac{V_{C}}{L^{2}}\left( \frac{R_{B}R_{A}}{R_{B} - R_{A}} \right)}}{where}{R_{B} = {{{\left( {\Phi_{LB} + \Phi_{RB}} \right)/\left( {2I} \right)}\mspace{14mu} {and}\mspace{14mu} R_{A}} = {\left( {\Phi_{LA} + \Phi_{RA}} \right)/{\left( {2I} \right).}}}}} & (2) \end{matrix}$

Alternatively, SBIS can be performed using a Hydra bioimpedance device, modified as described below, with the patient in a supine body position, for example during a standard PET. See Zhu et al.; Hydra 4200 Analyzer, Xitron Technologgies Inc., San Diego, Calif. As shown in FIG. 2, the method includes four electrodes 210, 220, 230, and 240 for injecting current placed on each hand (210, and 230) and foot (220 and 240), respectively, and four measuring electrodes 250, 260, 270, and 280 placed on the lower ribs (250 and 270) and the buttocks (260 and 280) on both sides of the body. An alternating current (e.g., 5 kHz, in a range of between about 0.05 mA and about 0.7 mA) is injected continuously during measurement. With this arangement of the sensors, the injected current penetrates the peritoneal cavity on both sides of the body. The Hydra 4200 Analyzer can be used for measuring only one segment, and therefore the analyzer was modified by the addition of a switch (not shown) between segments on either side of the body. The length of the segment L between electrodes 250 and 260 on one side and electrodes 270 and 280 on the other side can be measured, for example with a flexible tape. The segmental extracellular volume V contained within the region of interest 255 is calculated from

$\begin{matrix} {V = {\frac{K_{s}}{\sigma}\left( \frac{L^{2}}{R} \right)}} & (3) \end{matrix}$

where R is the average segmental resistance measured between the two sides of the body across the length L, and σ is the conductivity of the extracellular volume (21.28 mS/cm), and K_(s) is a calibration factor determined from the first filling volume (V_(I)) and the resistance of the empty (R_(E)) and the filled peritoneal cavity (R_(F)) using the equation

$\begin{matrix} {K_{s} = \frac{\sigma V_{1}}{L^{2}\left( {\frac{1}{R_{F}} - \frac{1}{R_{E}}} \right)}} & (4) \end{matrix}$

Calibration of the SBIS method to establish the relationship between change in resistance and fluid volume in the peritoneal cavity 255 is performed by introducing, as shown in FIG. 3, a known volume of dialysate at the beginning of treatment. The calibration factor K_(s) for this method can be different from the calibration factor K_(p) for the eight electrode method described above. The increase of fluid volume in the peritoneal cavity during dwell time is considered to be equal to the net ultrafiltration volume (UFVSBIS) occurring during this period. Drain volume (DVM) is measured by weighing the last drain volume.

Turning back to FIG. 1, a connecting cable 188 is used to transfer signals from the electrodes to the peritoneal cavity monitor (PCM) 190. The PCM is used to measure the impedance and transfer a wireless signal, described further below, to control the switch (SW) 410 shown in FIG. 4 to fill or drain the peritoneal cavity 255 into drain 420. Alternatively, for use in nonautomated PD (e.g., continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)), an audible or vibrating alarm can alert the patient or attendant to drain immediately. After the first drain of fluid out of the peritoneal cavity 255, and the infusion of 2 liters of fluid into the peritoneal cavity 255 for the typical four hours of dwell time, the volume of fluid in the peritoneal cavity 255 is periodically monitored by SBIS, to monitor the fluid volume in the peritoneal cavity (V_(PC)). The peritoneal cavity 255 can be drained when the volume in the peritoneal cavity 255 has reached a maximal volume, or when the volume in the peritoneal cavity 255 significantly decreases, such as a relative volume decrease equal to or greater than about 0.3 L, or when the volume in the peritoneal cavity 255 significantly decreases over a time interval, such as more than 10 minutes, or remains stable (i.e., unchanged) for a period of time, in a range of between about 10 minutes and about 30 minutes, preferably about 10 minutes, after which time a new PD dialysate volume (e.g., 2 L) can be infused, until the end of the treatment (typically four hours). A significant rate of decrease in the volume of fluid in the peritoneal cavity 255 can be a rate of volume decrease equal to or greater than about 0.03 L/min. Alternatively, a significant decrease in the volume of fluid in the peritoneal cavity 255 can be a relative volume decrease equal to or greater than about 0.3 L.

As illustrated in FIG. 5, the PCM 190 continuously collects impedance data from electrode array 505 within a low frequency range (e.g., between about 1 kHz and about 300 kHz) (impedance detector 510). A wireless transmitter 520 can be used, using a high frequency signal produced by signal generator 525 (e.g., 5 MHz), to send the impedance signal 535 to the receiver 530. The receiver 530 obtains the impedance signal 535 from an antenna 540 and employs the signal processor 550 to determine whether the switch (SW) 410 should be open or closed for filling or draining according to the flow chart shown in FIG. 6, displaying the result on display 560. As shown in FIG. 6, the method starts with bio-impedance analysis (BIA) of the patient at step 610, followed by a dialysate fill, at step 620, into the peritoneal cavity of the patient of a predetermined volume (e.g., 2 L). Then, step 630 is a calibration of the change in resistance across the distance L from the start of fill to the end of fill, to determine K_(p). The volume of dialysate in the peritoneal cavity is subsequently calculated at step 640, and the criterion of slope of change in V_(PC) during 5 minutes, SV_(PC), is established at step 650. If SV_(PC) is less than a threshold level (e.g., 0.03 L/min) at step 655, then the switch 410 (SW) is opened for draining at step 660. If the absolute value of the change in V_(PC) (ΔV_(PC)) is less than a predetermined amount (e.g., 0.1 L) during a 30 min period at step 665, then the switch 410 (SW) is opened for draining at step 670. If neither of the conditions 655 and 665 are met, then the treatment continues until, at step 675, the treatment time is finished, and the treatment ends at step 680. A person of skill in the art, such as a physician or a nurse, can adjust or devise different conditions for draining as appropriate for a particular patient based on the description provided herein.

The PCM can be integrated into a peritoneal dialysis (PD) system, such as the Liberty® Cycler, that can include a volume of PD solution to be infused into a patient's peritoneal cavity in order to perform peritoneal dialysis on the patient, the peritoneal cavity monitor (PCM) to measure the volume of fluid in the patient's peritoneal cavity by segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (SBIS), to thereby determine an ultrafiltration volume of fluid accumulated in the patient's peritoneal cavity, and the switch, controlled by the PCM, for filling the patient's peritoneal cavity and draining the patient's peritoneal cavity when the ultrafiltration volume is unchanged, significantly decreased, or decreasing at a significant rate. Liberty® Cycler, Fresenius Medical Care North America, Waltham, Mass.; see U.S. Pat. No. 7,935,074 and U.S. application Ser. No. 12/709,039 published as US 2010/0222735 A1.

In one embodiment, the determination to drain the patient's peritoneal cavity and, optionally, exchange the dialysate (i.e., refill the patient's peritoneal cavity) during PD treatment, as shown in FIG. 6, is based on two criteria: 1) the slope of volume change in the peritoneal cavity (SV_(PC)) is less than about −0.03 L/min, in other words the V_(PC) decreases by more than about 0.3 L during 10 minutes, or 2) V_(PC) does not change during 30 minutes. During the entire treatment time, if the condition 1) or 2) is met, the switch (SW) opens automatically for draining, and, after the peritoneal cavity is drained, a new 2 L volume of dialysate will be infused into peritoneal cavity until the treatment is completed. Alternatively, an alarm (e.g., an audible or vibrating alarm) can alert the patient or attendant to trigger draining.

Exemplification

Segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (SBIS) using a Hydra 4200 Analyzer modified as described above was performed with the patients in supine body position during standard PET. See Zhu et al. Four electrodes for injecting current were placed on each hand and foot. Four measuring electrodes were placed on the lower ribs and the buttocks on both sides of the body. Calibration of the SBIS method to establish the relationship between change in resistance and fluid volume in the peritoneal cavity was performed by introducing a known volume of dialysate in the beginning of treatment. The increase of fluid volume in the peritoneal cavity during dwell time was considered to be equal to the net ultrafiltration volume (UFVSBIS) occurring during this period. Drain volume (DVM) was measured by weighing the last drain volume. Dialysate creatinine concentration (DCre) was determined at time points 0, 2 hrs, and at the end. Plasma creatinine concentration (PCre) was measured at the beginning of PET. D/P was calculated by DCre/PCre.

As shown in Table 1, UFV_(Diff) represents the change in net UFVSBIS between the beginning and the subsequent measurement time. UFVM (0.64, 0.63 and 0.26 L) and UFVSBIS (0.42, 0.54 and 0.05 L) were observed for each Patient 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Mean UFVM did not differ from the net UFVSBIS (0.51±0.22 vs 0.34±0.26 L) and mean DVM (2.62, 2.5 and 2.25 L for each patient) was approximately equal to the DVSBIS (2.0, 2.2 and 2.21 L for each) estimated by SBIS (2.46±0.19 vs 2.13±0.13 L).

The results shown in Table 1 provide information on the relationship between the change in UFV and transport of creatinine during PET. The availability of dynamic information on the ultrafiltration volume helps to understand the characteristics of the peritoneal membrane. The information might be useful for clinical practice, to adjust the PD procedure according to individual characteristics of the peritoneal membrane.

Additionally, the periodic measurement of the ultrafiltration volume enables draining the patient's peritoneal cavity at or near a maximum UFV_(Diff), which, as shown in Table 1, occurred for Patient 1 at about 2 hours of dwell time and for Patient 2 at about 3 hours of dwell time, and also enables identifying a patient whose peritoneal membrane is absorbing fluid from the dialysate from the beginning of the treatment and therefore showing a negative UFV_(Diff), such as Patient 3.

TABLE 1 Ultrafiltration volume results for 3 patients during PD treatment Dwell UFV_(Diff) UFV_(Diff) UFV_(Diff) time [L] [L] [L] D/P D/P D/P [Hours] Patient1 Patient2 Patient3 Patient1 Patient2 Patient3 0 0 0 0 0.02 0.27 0.02 1 0.53 0.23 −0.25 2 1 1.113 −0.5 0.35 0.71 0.55 3 0.53 1.98 −0.73 4 0.42 0.54 0.05 0.52 0.78 0.70

Optimal Dwell Time Example

Two pairs of electrodes were placed on both lateral aspects of the abdomen. Segmental spectroscopy (sBIS) was used to continuously monitor fluid changes during the dwell. UFV was calculated from the change in intraperitoneal fluid volume after 2 L PD fluid instillation. Optimal dwell time (ODT) is the time between start of PD and the point when fluid reabsorption is detected. Patients were studied twice in supine position using manual PD: 1) study1, regular procedure with 4 hours dwell time (DT), with sBIS monitored throughout the exchange; 2) study2 ODT procedure, dialysate was drained when the rate of change in fluid volume became negative (fluid being absorbed) or was flat (i.e., unchanged) for more than 10 minutes. Actual UFV (aUFV) was defined as the weight difference between drain and fill volumes.

Preliminary results in the three patients (Table 2) show that aUFV was identical to UFV estimated by sBIS. In the second study, the optimal time to drain was within the first two hours of dwell. FIG. 7 shows the changes in peritoneal fluid volume during PD in patient #5.

TABLE 2 DT, Study1 ODT, Study2 UFVMax, Patient min aUFV, L UFV, L min aUFV, L L #4 240 0.406 0.4 120 0.266 0.226 #5 245 0.04 −0.007 100 0.106 0.115 #6 212 0.396 0.327 87 0.368 0.312

By continuously monitoring changes in intraperitoneal fluid volume, sBIS allows maximization of UFV by optimizing DT. Any plateau or decrease in UFV should prompt dialysate drainage. An ODT could be provided for every exchange, which is particularly advantageous with automated PD. Although additional exchanges may be required to reach a Kt/V target, an important advantage of the technique is its ability to maximize ultrafiltration volume.

The relevant teachings of all patents, published applications and references cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims. 

1. A peritoneal dialysis (PD) system for infusing a volume of PD solution into a patient's peritoneal cavity in order to perform peritoneal dialysis on the patient, the system comprising: a peritoneal cavity monitor (PCM) that measures the volume of fluid in the patient's peritoneal cavity by segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (SBIS), to thereby determine an ultrafiltration volume of fluid in the patient's peritoneal cavity; and a switch, controlled by the PCM, for filling the patient's peritoneal cavity and draining the patient's peritoneal cavity when the ultrafiltration volume is unchanged over time, significantly decreased, or decreasing at a significant rate.
 2. A peritoneal dialysis (PD) system for infusing a volume of PD solution into a patient's peritoneal cavity in order to perform peritoneal dialysis on the patient, the system comprising: a peritoneal cavity monitor (PCM) that measures the volume of fluid in the patient's peritoneal cavity by segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (SBIS), to thereby determine an ultrafiltration volume of fluid in the patient's peritoneal cavity; and an alarm, controlled by the PCM, for indicating when the patient's peritoneal cavity is to be drained when the ultrafiltration volume is unchanged over time, significantly decreased, or decreasing at a significant rate.
 3. The peritoneal dialysis (PD) system of claim 2, wherein the switch is controlled by the PCM by wireless communication.
 4. A method of peritoneal dialysis of a patient, the method comprising: a) introducing a volume of peritoneal dialysis solution into the peritoneal cavity of the patient; b) measuring periodically the volume of fluid in the patient's peritoneal cavity by segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy (SBIS), to thereby determine an ultrafiltration volume of fluid in the patient's peritoneal cavity; and c) draining the patient's peritoneal cavity when the ultrafiltration volume is unchanged over time, significantly decreased, or decreasing at a significant rate.
 5. The method of claim 4, further including refilling the peritoneal cavity of the patient with another volume of peritoneal dialysis solution. 